SM icon

SM Energy
SM

Overview Fund Activity

265 hedge funds and large institutions have $2.41B invested in SM Energy in 2015 Q3 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 37 funds opening new positions, 112 increasing their positions, 72 reducing their positions, and 52 closing their positions.

Holders
265
Holders Change
-17
Holders Change %
-6.03%
% of All Funds
7.41%
Holding in Top 10
5
Holding in Top 10 Change
+1
Holding in Top 10 Change %
+25%
% of All Funds
0.14%
New
37
Increased
112
Reduced
72
Closed
52
Calls
$41.8M
Puts
$48.9M
Net Calls
-$7.1M
Net Calls Change
+$7.82M

Top Buyers

1
Fidelity Investments
1
Fidelity Investments
Massachusetts
$227M
2
Millennium Management
2
Millennium Management
New York
$62.7M
3
CCM
3
Causeway Capital Management
California
$83.6M
4
SCM
4
SIR Capital Management
New York
$31.7M
5
CCP
5
Caymus Capital Partners
Texas
$38.2M

Top Sellers

1
Goldman Sachs
1
Goldman Sachs
New York
$29.5M
2
Balyasny Asset Management
2
Balyasny Asset Management
Illinois
$0
3
AQR Capital Management
3
AQR Capital Management
Connecticut
$10.2M
4
HCM
4
Highbridge Capital Management
New York
$0
5
HCM
5
Hayman Capital Management
Texas
$0
Name Holding Trade Value Shares
Change 		Shares
Change %
BG
76
BlackRock Group
United Kingdom
$4.27M -$82.3K -2,568 -2%
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)
77
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)
California
$4.07M +$120K +3,732 +3%
Allianz Asset Management
78
Allianz Asset Management
Germany
$3.82M +$561K +17,507 +17%
JG
79
Jefferies Group
New York
$3.81M -$1.04M -32,572 -21%
William Blair Investment Management
80
William Blair Investment Management
Illinois
$3.76M +$3.76M +117,432 New
CIBC Private Wealth Group
81
CIBC Private Wealth Group
Georgia
$3.7M – – –
Citigroup
82
Citigroup
New York
$3.67M -$1.92M -59,965 -34%
RFC
83
Russell Frank Company
Washington
$3.43M -$667K -20,808 -16%
US Bancorp
84
US Bancorp
Minnesota
$3.38M -$21.7K -678 -0.6%
PI
85
Putnam Investments
Massachusetts
$3.28M +$34.6K +1,080 +1%
State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System
86
State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System
Florida
$3.25M +$20.4K +638 +0.6%
RhumbLine Advisers
87
RhumbLine Advisers
Massachusetts
$3.21M +$187K +5,821 +6%
TRSOTSOK
88
Teachers Retirement System of the State of Kentucky
Kentucky
$2.9M – – –
Marshall Wace
89
Marshall Wace
United Kingdom
$2.89M +$2.89M +90,030 New
BlackRock
90
BlackRock
New York
$2.88M +$485K +15,149 +20%
Swiss National Bank
91
Swiss National Bank
Switzerland
$2.83M +$362K +11,300 +15%
O
92
OppenheimerFunds
New York
$2.83M +$2.83M +88,199 New
WSFS
93
Wilmington Savings Fund Society
Delaware
$2.81M -$338K -10,560 -11%
TA
94
Teachers Advisors
New York
$2.8M -$228K -7,127 -8%
Retirement Systems of Alabama
95
Retirement Systems of Alabama
Alabama
$2.76M +$17.5K +545 +0.6%
SDIC
96
South Dakota Investment Council
South Dakota
$2.68M +$509K +15,900 +23%
CC
97
Capital Counsel
New York
$2.66M – – –
CPA
98
Columbia Pacific Advisors
Washington
$2.56M +$1.12M +34,900 +78%
AA
99
Alta Advisers
United Kingdom
$2.43M +$2.43M +75,760 New
SIC
100
Schwartz Investment Counsel
Michigan
$2.4M +$1.44M +45,000 +150%
2 3
4
5 6