Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF

RZG

Valor de mercado US$ 117 mi

The Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to the 0.35% charged by the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF has outperformed over the last year, but the Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF has delivered higher total returns over the last five years.

The State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) charges a lower expense ratio than the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RZG). RZG has delivered higher 1-year returns than SLYG, but also experienced a worse 5-year maximum drawdown.

The iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) charges a lower expense ratio than the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF (RZG). RZG has delivered higher total returns over the past one- and five-year periods.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF features a significantly lower expense ratio and higher assets under management (AUM) than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF delivered a higher 1-year total return but experienced a steeper maximum drawdown over the last five years.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. Invesco's ETF has delivered higher one-year total returns but lower five-year growth than the Vanguard fund.

The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.06% than the 0.35% charged by the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF focuses on small-cap stocks with strong momentum while the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF targets large-cap market leaders.

RZG charges higher fees and yields less than SLYG, but delivered stronger one-year returns as of March 2026 RZG's smaller assets under management and much lower trading volume could make large trades slower or more expensive Sector weights differ: RZG leans into healthcare while SLYG splits most between industrials, tech, and healthcare

ISCG charges a much lower expense ratio and is nearly eight times larger than RZG. Both funds delivered similar strong gains over the past year, but ISCG holds over seven times as many stocks, spreading risk more broadly.

ISCG charges a much lower expense ratio and holds about 970 stocks, offering broader diversification than RZG RZG outperformed ISCG over the past five years, but ISCG led on one-year total return as of Jan. 9, 2026 ISCG tilts more toward industrials and technology, while RZG leans heavily on healthcare and financial services CEO says this is worth 18 Nvidias. Will this make the world's first trillionaire?

The Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF offers a much lower expense ratio and larger assets under management than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. RZG edges out VBK on one-year total return but both showed nearly identical drawdowns and long-term growth.