We are live on ! Find out more

iShares MSCI World ETF

URTH

Market cap $8.24B

207.54 USD

+0.28

0.14%

At close Updated Oct 15, 1:28 PM EDT

1 day

0.14%

5 days

-0.4%

1 month

0.93%

3 months

1.36%

6 months

7.35%

Year to date

11.28%

1 year

14.34%

5 years

58.43%

10 years

192.27%

News

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sentiment 3-Months

Positive 16.7%

Neutral 50%

Negative 33.3%

The Motley Fool

Two International ETFs With Contrasting Styles: iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Emerging Markets ETF (EEM)

iShares MSCI World ETF is significantly more affordable for long-term investors with an expense ratio of 0.24% compared to 0.72% for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has delivered higher 1-year total returns but historically experiences greater volatility and deeper maximum drawdowns.

Two International ETFs With Contrasting Styles: iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Emerging Markets ETF (EEM)

The Motley Fool

Better International ETF: Vanguard VEA vs. iShares URTH

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF excludes U.S. equities, whereas the iShares MSCI World ETF includes them as part of its global strategy. The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF is significantly more cost-efficient with a 0.03% expense ratio and a higher dividend yield.

Better International ETF: Vanguard VEA vs. iShares URTH

The Motley Fool

Better Global ETF: Vanguard's VT vs. the iShares URTH

The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio than the iShares MSCI World ETF. The iShares MSCI World ETF focuses exclusively on developed markets, while the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF includes exposure to emerging economies.

Better Global ETF: Vanguard's VT vs. the iShares URTH

The Motley Fool

Which International ETF Is the Better Buy: Schwab's Emerging Markets SCHE or iShares' World ETF URTH?

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio and a higher trailing-12-month dividend yield than iShares MSCI World ETF. iShares MSCI World ETF provides exposure to developed economies and has delivered higher 5-year growth with lower price volatility.

Which International ETF Is the Better Buy: Schwab's Emerging Markets SCHE or iShares' World ETF URTH?

The Motley Fool

NZAC vs. URTH: Which Global ETF Is the Better Buy?

The State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) offers a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield than the iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). While both funds hold tech giants as top positions, NZAC applies a specific climate screen and includes emerging markets.

NZAC vs. URTH: Which Global ETF Is the Better Buy?

The Motley Fool

Schwab Emerging Markets ETF vs. iShares World ETF: Which International ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors?

URTH targets developed markets, while SCHE focuses on emerging economies. SCHE offers a significantly lower expense ratio and higher yield than URTH.

Schwab Emerging Markets ETF vs. iShares World ETF: Which International ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors?

The Motley Fool

State Street vs. iShares: Which Global ETF Offers Better Value?

State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF offers a lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to 0.24% for iShares MSCI World ETF. The iShares fund focuses exclusively on developed markets while the State Street ETF includes emerging markets and small-cap stocks.

State Street vs. iShares: Which Global ETF Offers Better Value?

The Motley Fool

iShares' URTH or Schwab's SCHF: Which International ETF Is the Better Buy?

Schwab International Equity ETF features a significantly lower expense ratio and higher dividend yield than iShares MSCI World ETF. iShares MSCI World ETF includes heavy exposure to U.S. technology giants while Schwab International Equity ETF focuses exclusively on developed markets outside the United States.

iShares' URTH or Schwab's SCHF: Which International ETF Is the Better Buy?

The Motley Fool

Diversify With Global ETFS: ACWX's Higher Yield or URTH's Stronger Growth?

ACWX has a higher expense ratio but offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield compared to URTH. URTH's portfolio is dominated by U.S. tech giants, while ACWX focuses on non-U.S. equities with a tilt toward financial services.

Diversify With Global ETFS: ACWX's Higher Yield or URTH's Stronger Growth?

The Motley Fool

International Exposure: SPDW's Lower Costs vs. URTH's U.S. Giants

SPDW charges much lower fees and offers a higher yield than URTH. URTH holds more U.S. tech giants, while SPDW focuses exclusively on developed markets outside the U.S. SPDW saw a higher 1-year return but experienced a slightly deeper five-year drawdown.

International Exposure: SPDW's Lower Costs vs. URTH's U.S. Giants

See News Rankings

Price charts implemented using Lightweight Charts™