Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

ECML

Market cap $135M

Overview Fund Activity

33.49 USD

-0.02

0.06%

At close Updated Sep 17, 4:00 PM EDT

1 day

-0.06%

5 days

-1.88%

1 month

2.86%

3 months

10.67%

6 months

9.55%

Year to date

5.51%

1 year

-0.56%

5 years

32.16%

10 years

32.16%

0

Funds holding %

of 7,463 funds

–

Analysts bullish %

Fund manager confidence

Based on 2025 Q2 regulatory disclosures by fund managers ($100M+ AUM)

0.88% more ownership

Funds ownership: 86.86% [Q1] → 87.74% (+0.88%) [Q2]

0% more funds holding in top 10

Funds holding in top 10: 1 [Q1] → 1 (+0) [Q2]

7% less capital invested

Capital invested by funds: $137M [Q1] → $128M (-$9.4M) [Q2]

29% less funds holding

Funds holding: 7 [Q1] → 5 (-2) [Q2]

50% less repeat investments, than reductions

Existing positions increased: 1 | Existing positions reduced: 2

100% less first-time investments, than exits

New positions opened: 0 | Existing positions closed: 2

See Fund Rankings

Financial journalist opinion

ECML: Costly AI-Driven ETF Producing Inconsistent Results

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF is designed based on the output of an AI model that uses machine learning to predict future earnings per share for a universe of roughly 1,600 U.S. companies. The ECML goal is to select the most deeply discounted 60-70 non-financial stocks that aren't "value traps." Fortunately, I found its value features excellent, and ECML has a 10.92x forward P/E. However, its growth and momentum features are poor, and I expect the strategy to produce inconsistent results. Lately, it's been one of the few value ETFs to deliver a loss.

ECML: Costly AI-Driven ETF Producing Inconsistent Results

Q2 2025 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

In 2Q25, All Cap Value, All Cap Blend, and Large Cap Blend styles earn attractive-or-better ratings, driven by quality stock holdings and low costs. Only the top 30% of ETFs and mutual funds achieve attractive-or-better ratings, emphasizing the importance of high-quality holdings and low fees. Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF is the top-rated All Cap Value fund, while Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund is the worst-rated Small-Cap Growth fund.

Q2 2025 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

How To Find The Best Style ETFs For Q1 2025

The sheer number of ETFs, especially within the same style, complicates investor choices due to vastly different portfolios and risk profiles. Manually analyzing each ETF is impractical; investors risk insufficient analysis and missed opportunities due to the extensive number of holdings. EA Series Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF ranks as the top overall style ETF, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ranks last among the best.

How To Find The Best Style ETFs For Q1 2025

Q1 2025 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

All Cap Value, Large Cap Value, and All Cap Blend styles receive Attractive-or-better ratings. High-quality holdings and low costs are essential for ETFs and mutual funds to earn an Attractive-or-better Predictive Rating. Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF is the top-rated All Cap Value fund, while 1290 Essex Small Cap Growth Fund is the worst-rated Small Cap Growth fund.

Q1 2025 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

Q1 2024 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

All Cap Value, Large Cap Value, and All Cap Blend styles earn an Attractive-or-better rating at the beginning of 1Q24. Investors should focus on style funds that hold quality stocks, such as the mentioned styles. Cheap funds can dupe investors, so it's important to invest in funds with good stocks and low fees.

See News Rankings

Charts implemented using Lightweight Charts™