Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK
87 hedge funds and large institutions have $85.5M invested in Mammoth Energy Services in 2019 Q3 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 10 funds opening new positions, 37 increasing their positions, 29 reducing their positions, and 23 closing their positions.
223% more call options, than puts
Call options by funds: $168K | Put options by funds: $52K
28% more repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 37 | Existing positions reduced: 29
0% more funds holding in top 10
Funds holding in top 10: 1 → 1 (0)
4% less ownership
Funds ownership: 80.58% → 76.58% (-4%)
13% less funds holding
Funds holding: 100 → 87 (-13)
57% less first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 10 | Existing positions closed: 23
66% less capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $249M → $85.5M (-$163M)
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Morgan Stanley
New York
|
+$3.39M |
| 2 |
Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management
Los Angeles,
California
|
+$1.37M |
| 3 |
Russell Investments Group
London,
United Kingdom
|
+$1.21M |
| 4 |
Two Sigma Investments
New York
|
+$1.2M |
| 5 |
Goldman Sachs
New York
|
+$1.08M |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Janus Henderson Group
London,
United Kingdom
|
-$8.23M |
| 2 |
Principal Financial Group
Des Moines,
Iowa
|
-$3.31M |
| 3 |
Boston Partners
Boston,
Massachusetts
|
-$2.75M |
| 4 |
State of New Jersey Common Pension Fund D
Trenton,
New Jersey
|
-$1.72M |
| 5 |
Renaissance Technologies
New York
|
-$1.15M |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIM
101
MetLife Investment Management
Whippany,
New Jersey
| – | -$43.2K | -6,277 | Closed |
|
|
MLICM
102
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife)
New York
| – | -$31.3K | -4,547 | Closed |
|
|
QT
103
Quantbot Technologies
New York
| – | -$29K | -4,300 | Closed |
|
104
Canada Life
Winnipeg,
Manitoba, Canada
| – | -$12K | -1,767 | Closed |
|
|
PA
105
Parallel Advisors
San Francisco,
California
| – | -$8K | -1,093 | Closed |
|
106
CAPTRUST Financial Advisors
Raleigh,
North Carolina
| – | -$3K | -405 | Closed |
|
|
AG
107
Advisor Group
Phoenix,
Arizona
| – | -$2K | -346 | Closed |
|
|
PCP
108
Proficio Capital Partners
Newton,
Massachusetts
| – | -$1K | -185 | Closed |
|
TUSK Hedge Fund Activity: Q3 2019 in Review
87 of the 4,560 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) for Q3 2019, worth a combined $85.5M — down 66% from $249M a quarter earlier.
Sellers outnumbered buyers: 23 funds closed out of TUSK and 10 opened new positions — a net loss of 13 holders — while 29 trimmed existing stakes and 37 added.
The largest buyer was Morgan Stanley, adding an estimated $3.39M. The largest seller was Janus Henderson Group, cutting an estimated $8.23M.
- 87 institutional investors held Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) as of Q3 2019, down from 100 in Q2 2019.
- Funds reported $85.5M of Mammoth Energy Services stock for Q3 2019, down 66% quarter-over-quarter.
- 10 funds opened new Mammoth Energy Services positions in Q3 2019 and 23 closed out, a net change of -13 holders.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services buyer in Q3 2019 was Morgan Stanley, an estimated $3.39M added.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services seller in Q3 2019 was Janus Henderson Group, an estimated $8.23M sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q3 2019.