Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK
67 hedge funds and large institutions have $608M invested in Mammoth Energy Services in 2017 Q2 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 8 funds opening new positions, 32 increasing their positions, 21 reducing their positions, and 14 closing their positions.
100% more funds holding in top 10
Funds holding in top 10: 1 → 2 (+1)
52% more repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 32 | Existing positions reduced: 21
0% more capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $606M → $608M (+$2.02M)
1.67% less ownership
Funds ownership: 75.13% → 73.46% (-1.7%)
9% less funds holding
Funds holding: 74 → 67 (-7)
43% less first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 8 | Existing positions closed: 14
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
WC
Wexford Capital
West Palm Beach,
Florida
|
+$85.2M |
| 2 |
Janus Henderson Group
London,
United Kingdom
|
+$44.1M |
| 3 |
CAM
Cortina Asset Management
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
|
+$4.54M |
| 4 |
American Century Companies
Kansas City,
Missouri
|
+$4.14M |
| 5 |
RA
Royce & Associates
New York
|
+$2.26M |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Millennium Management
New York
|
-$2.71M |
| 2 |
PE
Point72 Europe
London,
United Kingdom
|
-$1.21M |
| 3 |
Goldman Sachs
New York
|
-$1.06M |
| 4 |
SIM
Spark Investment Management
New York
|
-$1.03M |
| 5 |
UOC
UBS O'Connor
Chicago,
Illinois
|
-$783K |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DTL
76
Dynamic Technology Lab
Singapore
| – | -$233K | -10,857 | Closed |
|
|
CSS
77
Cubist Systematic Strategies
Stamford,
Connecticut
| – | -$98K | -4,543 | Closed |
|
|
CAM
78
ClariVest Asset Management
San Diego,
California
| – | -$85K | -3,922 | Closed |
|
|
IA
79
IndexIQ Advisors
New York
| – | -$4K | -208 | Closed |
|
|
CCA
80
Catalyst Capital Advisors
Huntington,
New York
| – | -$3K | -120 | Closed |
|
81
Royal Bank of Canada
Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
| – | -$691 | -37 | -66% |
|
TUSK Hedge Fund Activity: Q2 2017 in Review
67 of the 4,011 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) for Q2 2017, worth a combined $608M — up 0.33% from $606M a quarter earlier.
Sellers outnumbered buyers: 14 funds closed out of TUSK and 8 opened new positions — a net loss of 6 holders — while 21 trimmed existing stakes and 32 added.
The largest buyer was Wexford Capital, adding an estimated $85.2M. The largest seller was Millennium Management, cutting an estimated $2.71M.
- 67 institutional investors held Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) as of Q2 2017, down from 74 in Q1 2017.
- Funds reported $608M of Mammoth Energy Services stock for Q2 2017, up 0.33% quarter-over-quarter.
- 8 funds opened new Mammoth Energy Services positions in Q2 2017 and 14 closed out, a net change of -6 holders.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services buyer in Q2 2017 was Wexford Capital, an estimated $85.2M added.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services seller in Q2 2017 was Millennium Management, an estimated $2.71M sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q2 2017.