Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK
74 hedge funds and large institutions have $606M invested in Mammoth Energy Services in 2017 Q1 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 29 funds opening new positions, 23 increasing their positions, 21 reducing their positions, and 13 closing their positions.
123% more first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 29 | Existing positions closed: 13
41% more capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $430M → $606M (+$176M)
16% more funds holding
Funds holding: 64 → 74 (+10)
10% more repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 23 | Existing positions reduced: 21
0% more funds holding in top 10
Funds holding in top 10: 1 → 1 (0)
0.25% less ownership
Funds ownership: 75.38% → 75.13% (-0.25%)
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
BlackRock
New York
|
+$8.76M |
| 2 |
TAM
THB Asset Management
Norwalk,
Connecticut
|
+$4.73M |
| 3 |
PIM
Perkins Investment Management
Chicago,
Illinois
|
+$4.3M |
| 4 |
Luther King Capital Management (LKCM)
Fort Worth,
Texas
|
+$2.59M |
| 5 |
Goldman Sachs
New York
|
+$1.68M |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
PRCM
Pine River Capital Management
Minnetonka,
Minnesota
|
-$4.86M |
| 2 |
American Century Companies
Kansas City,
Missouri
|
-$4.51M |
| 3 |
LCM
Laurion Capital Management
New York
|
-$3.04M |
| 4 |
Franklin Resources
San Mateo,
California
|
-$2.6M |
| 5 |
DCM
Driehaus Capital Management
Chicago,
Illinois
|
-$1.79M |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OA
76
Omega Advisors
New York
| – | -$1.52M | -100,000 | Closed |
|
|
NC
77
Nokomis Capital
Dallas,
Texas
| – | -$1.41M | -92,696 | Closed |
|
|
NI
78
Numeric Investors
Boston,
Massachusetts
| – | -$1.36M | -89,210 | Closed |
|
|
PCM
79
Peregrine Capital Management
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
| – | -$829K | -54,527 | Closed |
|
|
HHC
80
Hutchin Hill Capital
New York
| – | -$496K | -32,600 | Closed |
|
81
Citadel Advisors
Miami,
Florida
| – | -$298K | -19,601 | Closed |
|
|
KJHP
82
K.J. Harrison & Partners
Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
| – | -$294K | -19,371 | Closed |
|
|
GP
83
GLG Partners
London,
United Kingdom
| – | -$284K | -18,717 | Closed |
|
84
Macquarie Group
Sydney, NSW 2000,
Australia
| – | -$73K | -4,796 | Closed |
|
|
SO
85
STRS Ohio
Columbus,
Ohio
| – | -$47.7K | -2,500 | Closed |
|
|
TRCT
86
Tower Research Capital (TRC)
New York
| – | -$14K | -911 | Closed |
|
|
PHK
87
Point72 Hong Kong
Hong Kong
| – | -$2K | -133 | Closed |
|
TUSK Hedge Fund Activity: Q1 2017 in Review
74 of the 4,017 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) for Q1 2017, worth a combined $606M — up 41% from $430M a quarter earlier.
Buyers outnumbered sellers: 29 funds opened new TUSK positions and 13 closed out — a net gain of 16 holders — while 23 added to existing stakes and 21 trimmed.
The largest buyer was BlackRock, adding an estimated $8.76M. The largest seller was Pine River Capital Management, cutting an estimated $4.86M.
- 74 institutional investors held Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) as of Q1 2017, up from 64 in Q4 2016.
- Funds reported $606M of Mammoth Energy Services stock for Q1 2017, up 41% quarter-over-quarter.
- 29 funds opened new Mammoth Energy Services positions in Q1 2017 and 13 closed out, a net change of +16 holders.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services buyer in Q1 2017 was BlackRock, an estimated $8.76M added.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services seller in Q1 2017 was Pine River Capital Management, an estimated $4.86M sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q1 2017.