Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK
58 hedge funds and large institutions have $126M invested in Mammoth Energy Services in 2022 Q3 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 11 funds opening new positions, 21 increasing their positions, 12 reducing their positions, and 2 closing their positions.
450% more first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 11 | Existing positions closed: 2
345% more capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $28.3M → $126M (+$97.7M)
165% more call options, than puts
Call options by funds: $143K | Put options by funds: $54K
75% more repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 21 | Existing positions reduced: 12
18% more funds holding
Funds holding: 49 → 58 (+9)
4% more ownership
Funds ownership: 74.36% → 78.36% (+4%)
0% more funds holding in top 10
Funds holding in top 10: 2 → 2 (0)
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
KWM
Kanen Wealth Management
Coconut Creek,
Florida
|
+$3.3M |
| 2 |
EI
EAM Investors
Solana Beach,
California
|
+$1.36M |
| 3 |
IECM
Intrinsic Edge Capital Management
Chicago,
Illinois
|
+$537K |
| 4 |
Millennium Management
New York
|
+$502K |
| 5 |
Adage Capital Partners
Boston,
Massachusetts
|
+$303K |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
BCM
Bridgeway Capital Management
Houston,
Texas
|
-$582K |
| 2 |
Russell Investments Group
London,
United Kingdom
|
-$239K |
| 3 |
SBIA
Sheaff Brock Investment Advisors
Indianapolis,
Indiana
|
-$220K |
| 4 |
Marshall Wace
London,
United Kingdom
|
-$189K |
| 5 |
Boston Partners
Boston,
Massachusetts
|
-$94.4K |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
51
Barclays
London,
United Kingdom
| $10K | +$1.83K | +526 | +23% |
|
52
Osaic Holdings
Scottsdale,
Arizona
| $7K | – | – | – |
|
|
IA
53
IFP Advisors
Tampa,
Florida
| $7K | +$698 | +200 | New |
|
54
Bank of America
Charlotte,
North Carolina
| $2K | – | – | – |
|
55
BNP Paribas Financial Markets
Paris,
France
| $1.31K | – | – | – |
|
|
SBIA
56
Sheaff Brock Investment Advisors
Indianapolis,
Indiana
| – | -$220K | -100,000 | Closed |
|
|
CSS
57
Cubist Systematic Strategies
Stamford,
Connecticut
| – | -$25K | -11,580 | Closed |
|
58
JP Morgan Chase
New York
| – | -$12.4K | -3,559 | -100% |
|
59
Wells Fargo
San Francisco,
California
| – | +$108 | +31 | +33% |
|
60
Royal Bank of Canada
Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
| – | +$398 | +114 | New |
|
TUSK Hedge Fund Activity: Q3 2022 in Review
58 of the 5,805 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) for Q3 2022, worth a combined $126M — up 345% from $28.3M a quarter earlier.
Buyers outnumbered sellers: 11 funds opened new TUSK positions and 2 closed out — a net gain of 9 holders — while 21 added to existing stakes and 12 trimmed.
The largest buyer was Kanen Wealth Management, adding an estimated $3.3M. The largest seller was Bridgeway Capital Management, cutting an estimated $582K.
- 58 institutional investors held Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) as of Q3 2022, up from 49 in Q2 2022.
- Funds reported $126M of Mammoth Energy Services stock for Q3 2022, up 345% quarter-over-quarter.
- 11 funds opened new Mammoth Energy Services positions in Q3 2022 and 2 closed out, a net change of +9 holders.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services buyer in Q3 2022 was Kanen Wealth Management, an estimated $3.3M added.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services seller in Q3 2022 was Bridgeway Capital Management, an estimated $582K sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q3 2022.