Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK
52 hedge funds and large institutions have $134M invested in Mammoth Energy Services in 2021 Q2 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 7 funds opening new positions, 19 increasing their positions, 13 reducing their positions, and 9 closing their positions.
46% more repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 19 | Existing positions reduced: 13
0% more funds holding in top 10
Funds holding in top 10: 2 → 2 (0)
0.42% less ownership
Funds ownership: 62.97% → 62.55% (-0.42%)
4% less funds holding
Funds holding: 54 → 52 (-2)
13% less capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $153M → $134M (-$19.3M)
22% less first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 7 | Existing positions closed: 9
52% less call options, than puts
Call options by funds: $31K | Put options by funds: $65K
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
V
ValueWorks
New York
|
+$1.01M |
| 2 |
Vanguard Group
Malvern,
Pennsylvania
|
+$889K |
| 3 |
Renaissance Technologies
New York
|
+$364K |
| 4 |
RA
Royce & Associates
New York
|
+$272K |
| 5 |
Morgan Stanley
New York
|
+$260K |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Millennium Management
New York
|
-$613K |
| 2 |
Susquehanna International Group
Bala Cynwyd,
Pennsylvania
|
-$399K |
| 3 |
BlackRock
New York
|
-$349K |
| 4 |
Citadel Advisors
Miami,
Florida
|
-$216K |
| 5 |
Goldman Sachs
New York
|
-$196K |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OSAM
51
O'Shaughnessy Asset Management
Stamford,
Connecticut
| $1K | – | – | – |
|
|
52
Citadel Advisors
Miami,
Florida
| – | -$216K | -40,601 | Closed |
|
|
53
Goldman Sachs
New York
| – | -$196K | -36,871 | Closed |
|
|
ECM
54
ExodusPoint Capital Management
New York
| – | -$141K | -26,542 | Closed |
|
|
SSA
55
Schonfeld Strategic Advisors
New York
| – | -$68K | -12,755 | Closed |
|
|
HF
56
HRT Financial
New York
| – | -$60K | -11,424 | Closed |
|
|
PCM
57
Pinz Capital Management
New York
| – | -$43K | -8,028 | Closed |
|
58
Citigroup
New York
| – | -$33K | -6,197 | Closed |
|
|
DWA
59
Dorsey Wright & Associates
Pasadena,
California
| – | -$32.9K | -6,190 | Closed |
|
|
IAIM
60
International Assets Investment Management
Orlando,
Florida
| – | -$1K | -204 | Closed |
|
61
Fidelity Investments
Boston,
Massachusetts
| – | +$4 | +1 | New |
|
TUSK Hedge Fund Activity: Q2 2021 in Review
52 of the 5,745 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) for Q2 2021, worth a combined $134M — down 13% from $153M a quarter earlier.
Sellers outnumbered buyers: 9 funds closed out of TUSK and 7 opened new positions — a net loss of 2 holders — while 13 trimmed existing stakes and 19 added.
The largest buyer was ValueWorks, adding an estimated $1.01M. The largest seller was Millennium Management, cutting an estimated $613K.
- 52 institutional investors held Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) as of Q2 2021, down from 54 in Q1 2021.
- Funds reported $134M of Mammoth Energy Services stock for Q2 2021, down 13% quarter-over-quarter.
- 7 funds opened new Mammoth Energy Services positions in Q2 2021 and 9 closed out, a net change of -2 holders.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services buyer in Q2 2021 was ValueWorks, an estimated $1.01M added.
- The largest Mammoth Energy Services seller in Q2 2021 was Millennium Management, an estimated $613K sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q2 2021.