Nu Skin
NUS
207 hedge funds and large institutions have $1.47B invested in Nu Skin in 2022 Q3 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 21 funds opening new positions, 71 increasing their positions, 79 reducing their positions, and 33 closing their positions.
0.43% less ownership
Funds ownership: 87.9% → 87.47% (-0.43%)
7% less funds holding
Funds holding: 222 → 207 (-15)
10% less repeat investments, than reductions
Existing positions increased: 71 | Existing positions reduced: 79
23% less capital invested
Capital invested by funds: $1.91B → $1.47B (-$440M)
36% less first-time investments, than exits
New positions opened: 21 | Existing positions closed: 33
52% less call options, than puts
Call options by funds: $3.94M | Put options by funds: $8.22M
Top Buyers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
State Street
Boston,
Massachusetts
|
+$12.7M |
| 2 |
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Austin,
Texas
|
+$6.16M |
| 3 |
Susquehanna International Group
Bala Cynwyd,
Pennsylvania
|
+$5.66M |
| 4 |
Invesco
Atlanta,
Georgia
|
+$4.59M |
| 5 |
Morgan Stanley
New York
|
+$4.48M |
Top Sellers
| Rank | Fund | Capital Flow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Renaissance Technologies
New York
|
-$11.5M |
| 2 |
Bank of America
Charlotte,
North Carolina
|
-$8.31M |
| 3 |
Manulife (Manufacturers Life Insurance)
Canada,
Ontario, Canada
|
-$6.07M |
| 4 |
Jacobs Levy Equity Management
Florham Park,
New Jersey
|
-$4.58M |
| 5 |
LSV Asset Management
Chicago,
Illinois
|
-$4.07M |
| Name | Holding | Trade Value |
Shares Change |
Change in Stake |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACM
226
Aquatic Capital Management
Chicago,
Illinois
| – | -$48K | -1,100 | Closed |
|
|
ETC
227
Exchange Traded Concepts
Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma
| – | -$23K | -530 | Closed |
|
|
CFB
228
Cullen/Frost Bankers
San Antonio,
Texas
| – | -$2K | -40 | Closed |
|
|
CA
229
CoreCap Advisors
Southfield,
Michigan
| – | -$1K | -24 | Closed |
|
|
GRP
230
Global Retirement Partners
San Rafael,
California
| – | -$916 | -22 | -73% |
|
|
JWA
231
JFS Wealth Advisors
Hermitage,
Pennsylvania
| – | -$833 | -20 | -61% |
|
232
Rockefeller Capital Management
New York
| – | -$416 | -10 | -59% |
|
|
AF
233
Allworth Financial
Folsom,
California
| – | -$208 | -5 | -50% |
|
|
DI
234
Disciplined Investments
Tulsa,
Oklahoma
| – | -$42 | -1 | -7% |
|
235
Parallax Volatility Advisers
San Francisco,
California
| – | +$83 | +2 | New |
|
|
SIC
236
SJS Investment Consulting
Sylvania,
Ohio
| – | +$333 | +8 | New |
|
|
FHA
237
First Horizon Advisors
Memphis,
Tennessee
| – | +$708 | +17 | New |
|
NUS Hedge Fund Activity: Q3 2022 in Review
207 of the 5,805 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Nu Skin (NUS) for Q3 2022, worth a combined $1.47B — down 23% from $1.91B a quarter earlier.
Sellers outnumbered buyers: 33 funds closed out of NUS and 21 opened new positions — a net loss of 12 holders — while 79 trimmed existing stakes and 71 added.
The largest buyer was State Street, adding an estimated $12.7M. The largest seller was Renaissance Technologies, cutting an estimated $11.5M.
- 207 institutional investors held Nu Skin (NUS) as of Q3 2022, down from 222 in Q2 2022.
- Funds reported $1.47B of Nu Skin stock for Q3 2022, down 23% quarter-over-quarter.
- 21 funds opened new Nu Skin positions in Q3 2022 and 33 closed out, a net change of -12 holders.
- The largest Nu Skin buyer in Q3 2022 was State Street, an estimated $12.7M added.
- The largest Nu Skin seller in Q3 2022 was Renaissance Technologies, an estimated $11.5M sold.
Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q3 2022.