We are live on ! Find out more
NINE

Nine Energy Service
NINE

Delisted

NINE was delisted on the 30th of January, 2026.

Back to rankings

77 hedge funds and large institutions have $466M invested in Nine Energy Service in 2019 Q1 according to their latest regulatory filings, with 13 funds opening new positions, 30 increasing their positions, 20 reducing their positions, and 12 closing their positions.

New
Increased
Maintained
Reduced
Closed

50% more funds holding in top 10

Funds holding in top 10: 2 → 3 (+1)

50% more repeat investments, than reductions

Existing positions increased: 30 | Existing positions reduced: 20

1.82% more ownership

Funds ownership: 66.35% → 68.18% (+1.8%)

1% more funds holding

Funds holding: 76 → 77 (+1)

8% more first-time investments, than exits

New positions opened: 13 | Existing positions closed: 12

3% more capital invested

Capital invested by funds: $451M → $466M (+$14.3M)

Holders
77
Holders Change
+1
Holders Change %
+1.32%
% of All Funds
1.67%
Holding in Top 10
3
Holding in Top 10 Change
+1
Holding in Top 10 Change %
+50%
% of All Funds
0.06%
New
13
Increased
30
Reduced
20
Closed
12
Calls
–
Puts
–
Net Calls
–
Net Calls Change
–

Top Buyers

Rank Fund Capital Flow
1
Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management
Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management
California
+$8.49M
2
Wellington Management Group
Wellington Management Group
Massachusetts
+$5.83M
3
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Texas
+$2.69M
4
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Minnesota
+$1.95M
5
DCM
Driehaus Capital Management
Illinois
+$1.78M

Top Sellers

Rank Fund Capital Flow
1
Fidelity Investments
Fidelity Investments
Massachusetts
-$6.61M
2
MFIMFI
Mesirow Financial Investment Management - Fixed Income
Illinois
-$2.73M
3
BlackRock
BlackRock
New York
-$2.34M
4
JP Morgan Chase
JP Morgan Chase
New York
-$1.91M
5
D.E. Shaw & Co
D.E. Shaw & Co
New York
-$1.31M
Name Holding Trade Value Shares
Change 		Change in
Stake
JPMIA
26
J.P. Marvel Investment Advisors
Massachusetts
$1.55M – – –
Charles Schwab
27
Charles Schwab
California
$1.54M +$71.6K +2,964 +5%
Bank of New York Mellon
28
Bank of New York Mellon
New York
$1.53M -$51.7K -2,143 -3%
SCM
29
Sterling Capital Management
North Carolina
$1.44M – – –
Goldman Sachs
30
Goldman Sachs
New York
$1.42M -$37.2K -1,540 -2%
SIM
31
Spark Investment Management
New York
$1.35M +$1.45M +59,847 New
Renaissance Technologies
32
Renaissance Technologies
New York
$1.35M +$466K +19,295 +48%
GCM
33
GeoSphere Capital Management
Florida
$1.3M +$1.38M +57,199 New
PCM
34
Proxima Capital Management
New York
$1.24M +$109K +4,522 +9%
Fidelity Investments
35
Fidelity Investments
Massachusetts
$1.21M -$6.61M -273,800 -84%
PCM
36
Prelude Capital Management
New York
$1.12M +$1.19M +49,399 New
TCIM
37
TIAA CREF Investment Management
New York
$1.12M -$1.05M -43,522 -47%
Marshall Wace
38
Marshall Wace
United Kingdom
$763K -$219K -9,082 -21%
Swiss National Bank
39
Swiss National Bank
Switzerland
$684K +$43.5K +1,800 +6%
Brown Advisory
40
Brown Advisory
Maryland
$606K +$646K +26,740 New
MFIM
41
Mesirow Financial Investment Management
Illinois
$576K +$195K +8,096 +47%
Bank of America
42
Bank of America
North Carolina
$567K +$162K +6,691 +36%
CS
43
Credit Suisse
Switzerland
$552K -$298K -12,323 -34%
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)
44
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)
California
$515K -$21.7K -899 -4%
Arrowstreet Capital
45
Arrowstreet Capital
Massachusetts
$484K +$516K +21,368 New
RhumbLine Advisers
46
RhumbLine Advisers
Massachusetts
$465K -$10.7K -444 -2%
New York State Common Retirement Fund
47
New York State Common Retirement Fund
New York
$376K – – –
BGIM
48
Brandywine Global Investment Management
Pennsylvania
$366K – – –
Ameriprise
49
Ameriprise
Minnesota
$358K +$78.8K +3,262 +26%
Squarepoint
50
Squarepoint
New York
$349K +$48.2K +1,995 +15%
1
2
3 4

NINE Hedge Fund Activity: Q1 2019 in Review

77 of the 4,621 institutional investors tracked by Wall St. Rank reported a position in Nine Energy Service (NINE) for Q1 2019, worth a combined $466M — up 3.2% from $451M a quarter earlier.

Buyers outnumbered sellers: 13 funds opened new NINE positions and 12 closed out — a net gain of 1 holder — while 30 added to existing stakes and 20 trimmed.

The largest buyer was Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management, adding an estimated $8.49M. The largest seller was Fidelity Investments, cutting an estimated $6.61M.

  • 77 institutional investors held Nine Energy Service (NINE) as of Q1 2019, up from 76 in Q4 2018.
  • Funds reported $466M of Nine Energy Service stock for Q1 2019, up 3.2% quarter-over-quarter.
  • 13 funds opened new Nine Energy Service positions in Q1 2019 and 12 closed out, a net change of +1 holder.
  • The largest Nine Energy Service buyer in Q1 2019 was Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management, an estimated $8.49M added.
  • The largest Nine Energy Service seller in Q1 2019 was Fidelity Investments, an estimated $6.61M sold.

Based on aggregated 13F filings for Q1 2019.